Evaluation of incision healing status after transverse uterine fundal incision for cesarean delivery and postoperative pregnancy: a ten-year single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Transverse uterine fundal incision (TUFI) is a beneficial procedure for mothers and babies at risk due to placenta previa-accreta, and has been implemented worldwide. However, the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent pregnancy remains unclear. We therefore evaluated the TUFI wound scar to determine the approval criteria for pregnancy after this surgery. METHODS: Between April 2012 and August 2022, we performed TUFI on 150 women. Among 132 of the 150 women whose uteruses were preserved after TUFI, 84 women wished to conceive again. The wound healing status, scar thickness, and resumption of blood flow were evaluated in these women by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and sonohysterogram at 12 months postoperatively. Furthermore, TUFI scars were directly observed during the Cesarean sections in women who subsequently conceived. RESULTS: Twelve women were lost to follow-up and one conceived before the evaluation, therefore 71 cases were analyzed. MRI scans revealed that the "scar thickness", the thinnest part of the scar compared with the normal surrounding area, was ≥ 50% in all cases. The TUFI scars were enhanced in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI except for four women. However, the scar thickness in these four patients was greater than 80%. Twenty-three of the 71 women conceived after TUFI and delivered live babies without notable problems until August 2022. Their MRI scans before pregnancy revealed scar thicknesses of 50-69% in two cases and ≥ 70% in the remaining 21 cases. And resumption of blood flow was confirmed in all patients except two cases whose scar thickness ≥ 90%. No evidence of scar healing failure was detected at subsequent Cesarean sections, but partial thinning was found in two patients whose scar thicknesses were 50-69%. In one woman who conceived seven months after TUFI and before the evaluation, uterine rupture occurred at 26 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS: Certain criteria, including an appropriate suture method, delayed conception for at least 12 months, evaluation of the TUFI scar at 12 months postoperatively, and cautious postoperative management, must all be met in order to approve a post-TUFI pregnancy. Possible scar condition criteria for permitting a subsequent pregnancy could include the scar thickness being ≥ 70% of the surrounding area on MRI scans, at least partially resumed blood flow, and no abnormalities on the sonohysterogram. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Digital versus speculum insertion of Foley catheter for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare Foley catheter insertion by digital blind method to its placement with a sterile speculum in women with unripe cervix for induction of labor. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2023. Included studies compared digital to speculum placement of the Foley catheter for labor induction. Data from the included studies were extracted and pooled using RevMan software for meta-analysis. The primary outcome was pain score during the procedure measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included Foley catheter insertion duration, cesarean delivery rate, induction to delivery interval, Bishop score, need for other cervical ripening methods, maternal satisfaction, and maternal fever. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving a total of 600 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pain during the procedure and Foley catheter insertion duration were significantly reduced in the digital insertion group compared to the speculum-guided group (p < 0.05). The Bishop score showed a significant improvement in the digital Foley catheter placement group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the cesarean delivery rate or the requirement for additional cervical ripening methods between the two groups. Maternal satisfaction with the delivery process was significantly improved in the digital insertion group (p < 0.001). Induction to delivery interval and maternal fever were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Digital placement of Foley catheter can be considered as an alternative to the sterile speculum method for pre-induction cervical ripening. More trials are required to confirm our findings.

Effects of endometrial versus non-endometrial suturing on isthmocele development; a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Incomplete healing after cesarean section (CS) can result in isthmocele formation. When suturing the uterus, fully folding the wound lips may embed the endometrial layer into the myometrium, leading to isthmocele development. Hence, this study aimed to compare the effects of endometrial and non-endometrial suturing on isthmocele development. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included 274 patients. Women who underwent primary CS were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups: endometrial suturing and non-endometrial suturing. The primary outcome was isthmocele rate at postpartum 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the volume of the isthmocele, thickness of the residual myometrium, menstrual irregularities (intermenstrual spotting), and the relationship between the isthmocele and uterine position. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients (81 in the endometrial suturing group and 78 in the non-endometrial suturing group) were analyzed. The incidence of isthmocele was significantly lower in the non-endometrial suturing group than in the endometrial suturing group (12 [15.4%] vs. 24 [29.6%] patients; p = 0.032). Menstrual irregularities, such as intermenstrual spotting, were significantly higher in the endometrial suturing group than in the non-endometrial group (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Uterine closure with non-endometrial suturing was associated with significantly lower isthmocele development and less intermenstrual spotting compared to that with endometrial suturing.

Management of impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery.

Globally, more than 1 in 5 women give birth by cesarean delivery, and at least 5% of these births are at full cervical dilatation. In these circumstances, and when labor has been prolonged in the first stage of labor, the fetal head can become low and wedged deep in the woman's pelvis, making it difficult to deliver the baby. This emergency is known as impacted fetal head. These are technically challenging births associated with serious risks to both the woman and the baby. The difficulty in disimpacting the fetal head increases maternal risks of hemorrhage and injury to adjacent organs and may have long-term consequences for future pregnancies. In addition, there can be associated neonatal consequences, such as skull fractures, brain hemorrhage, hypoxic brain injury, and, rarely, perinatal death. Globally, maternity staff are increasingly encountering this emergency, with studies in the United Kingdom suggesting that impacted fetal head may complicate as many as 1 in 10 emergency cesarean deliveries. Moreover, there has been a sharp increase in reports of perinatal brain injuries associated with impaction of the fetal head at cesarean delivery. When an impacted fetal head occurs, the maternity team can employ a range of approaches to help deliver the fetal head, including an assistant (another obstetrician or midwife) pushing the head up from the vagina, delivering the baby feet first (reverse breech extraction), administering tocolysis to relax the uterus, and using a balloon cephalic elevation device (Fetal Pillow) to elevate the baby's head. However, there is currently no consensus on how best to manage these births, resulting in a lack of confidence among maternity staff, variable practice, and potentially avoidable harm in some circumstances. This article examined the evidence for the prevention and management of this critical obstetrical emergency and outlined recommendations for best practices and training.

Pyomyoma after caesarean section: a rare entity.

Pyomyoma, a rare complication of a myoma undergoing infarction and subsequent infection, may be a diagnostic challenge in patients with unexplained puerperal fever. A woman in her 30s presented with fever and foul-smelling discharge per vaginum, 6 months after her first caesarean section (CS). She underwent an elective CS for symptomatic placenta praevia at 34 weeks of gestation. Intra-operatively, post-partum haemorrhage was managed with uterotonics and blood transfusions. However, 2 weeks later, she developed a high-grade fever that was non-responsive to parenteral antibiotics. She continued to have intermittent episodes of high-grade fever, which were treated on an outpatient basis. Six months later, she developed purulent vaginal discharge, which grew Escherichia coli on bacterial culture. She received intravenous antibiotics and blood. Radiology confirmed the presence of a large fibroid with a focal capsular breach and peripherally enhanced collection extending to the endometrial cavity. The patient subsequently underwent a myomectomy. Intra-operatively, a large fundal myoma with endometrial breach and purulent discharge in the fibroid and endometrial cavity was noted. She sustained the procedure well and recovered uneventfully.

Surgical site infection following cesarean section and its predictors in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, surgery related deaths within 30 days of the procedure accounts the third contributor among all causes of deaths, with an estimated 4.2 million people annually and half of these deaths occur in low and middle income countries. OBJECTIVE: To determine the pooled prevalence of surgical site infection following cesarean section and its predictors in Ethiopia. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by using PRISMA guideline. An appropriate and comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, HINARI and Scopus was done. This SRMA included all articles conducted in all regional state of Ethiopia reporting the prevalence/proportion/incidence of SSI after cesarean section and/or associated factors. All observational study designs were included in this SRMA. Articles which lack our outcome of interest: SSI following cesarean section and its predictors were excluded from this SRMA. The I2 statistic was used to quantify heterogeneity across studies. Funnel plot asymmetry and Egger's tests were used to check for publication bias. A random effect model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of SSI. Adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was also considered to determine the association of identified variables with SSI. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA version 17 software. RESULT: Initially 6334 studies were identified and finally 19 studies were found eligible for the analysis. Studies with a score of 7 and above were included for the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The review was comprised of 14 cross sectional studies, 4 cohort and one case control studies. The pooled estimate of SSI in Ethiopia was 11.13% (95%CI, 9.29-12.97%). Prolonged labor (AOR = 3.16, 95% CI; (2.14-4.68)), chorioamnionitis (AOR = 4.26, 95% CI; (1.99-8.91)), prolonged PROM (AOR = 3.80, 95% CI; (2.51-5.62)), repeated vaginal examination (AOR = 3.80, 95% CI; (2.45-5.88)), decreased hemoglobin level (AOR = 4.57, 95%CI; (3.16-6.60)), vertical skin incision (AOR = 3.09, 95% CI; (2.04-4.67)) and general anesthesia (AOR = 1.82, 95% CI (1.21-2.75)) are significantly associated with SSI after cesarean section in Ethiopia. CONCLUSION: SSI after cesarean section in Ethiopia is high. Prolonged labor, chorioamnionits, prolonged PROM, repeated vaginal examination, decreased Hgb level, vertical skin incision and general anesthesia were positively associated. Thus, evidence based intra-partum care should be practiced.

Full-term pregnancy with retroperitoneal giant mucinous cyst: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Retroperitoneal benign cysts during pregnancy are extremely rare and often remain asymptomatic until they attain a very large size. Diagnosis typically relies on a pathological tissue biopsy. The decision to pursue 1-step or 2-step surgical treatment should be tailored to each individual case rather than generalized. PATIENT CONCERNS: This case report presents the unique scenario of a pregnant woman with a confirmed pregnancy complicated by a large retroperitoneal cyst. The patient had a retroperitoneal cyst during her initial pregnancy, which went undetected during the first cesarean section. However, it was identified during her second pregnancy by which time it had grown to 13.0 cm × 15.0 cm × 25.0 cm, and extended from the liver margin to right ovarian pelvic infundibulopelvic ligament. Consequently, it was removed smoothly during her second cesarean section. DIAGNOSES: Postoperative pathology results indicated a massive retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma. INTERVENTIONS: The giant retroperitoneal cyst was smoothly excised during the second cesarean delivery for 1-step surgical treatment. OUTCOMES: Under the combined spinal and epidural anesthesia, a live female infant was delivered at 38 3/7 gestational weeks and the neonatal weight was 3200g. Under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, the giant retroperitoneal cyst was excised smoothly without complications. LESSONS: The findings of this case report contribute to the understanding of the diagnostic modalities, surgical approaches and postoperative considerations of giant retroperitoneal cysts associated with pregnancy.

The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.

PURPOSE: The surgical technique for uterine closure following cesarean section influences the healing of the cesarean scar; however, there is still no consensus on the optimal technique regarding the closure of the endometrium layer. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of closure versus non-closure of the endometrium during cesarean section on the risk to develop uterine scar defect and associated symptoms. METHODS: A randomized prospective study was conducted of women undergoing first elective cesarean section at a single tertiary medical center. Exclusion criteria included previous uterine scar, preterm delivery and dysmorphic uterus. Women were randomized for endometrial layer closure versus non-closure. Six months following surgery, women were invited to the ambulatory gynecological clinic for follow-up visit. 2-D transvaginal ultrasound examination was performed to evaluate the cesarean scar characteristics. In addition, women were evaluated for symptoms that might be associated with uterine scar defect. Primary outcome was defined as the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) at the uterine cesarean scar. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. RESULTS: 130 women were recruited to the study, of them follow-up was achieved in 113 (86.9%). 61 (54%) vs. 52 (46%) of the women were included in the endometrial closure vs. non-closure groups, respectively. Groups were comparable for patient's demographic, clinical characteristics and follow-up time for postoperative evaluation. Median RMT was 5.3 (3.0-7.7) vs. 4.6 (3.0-6.5) mm for the endometrial closure and non-closure groups, respectively (p = 0.38). Substantially low RMT (< 2.5 mm) was measured in four (6.6%) women in the endometrial closure group and three (5.8%) of the women in the non-closure group (p = 0.86). All other uterine scar sonographic measurements, as well as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain and intermenstrual bleeding rates were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: Closure versus non-closure of the endometrial layer during cesarean uterine incision repair has no significant difference in cesarean scar characteristics and symptom rates at 6 months follow-up.

Ultrasound-guided caudal anaesthesia combined with epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Although epidural anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia are currently the general choices for patients undergoing caesarean section, these two neuraxial anaesthesia methods still have drawbacks. Caudal anaesthesia has been considered to be more appropriate for gynaecological surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare epidural anaesthesia combined with caudal anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia and single-space epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section with respect to postoperative comfort and intraoperative anaesthesia quality. METHODS: In this clinical trial, 150 patients undergoing elective caesarean section were recruited and randomized into three groups according to a ratio of 1:1:1to receive epidural anaesthesia only, spinal anaesthesia only or epidural anaesthesia combined with caudal anaesthesia. The primary outcome was postoperative comfort in the three groups. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative anaesthesia quality and the incidences of nausea, vomiting, postdural puncture headache, maternal bradycardia, or hypotension. RESULTS: More patients were satisfied with the intraoperative anaesthesia quality in the EAC group than in the EA group (P = 0.001). The obstetrician was more significantly satisfied with the intraoperative anaesthesia quality in the SA and EAC groups than in the EA group (P = 0.004 and 0.020, respectively). The parturients felt more comfortable after surgery in the EA and EAC groups (P = 0.007). The incidence of maternal hypotension during caesarean section was higher in the SA group than in the EA and EAC groups (P = 0.001 and 0.019, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural anaesthesia combined with caudal anaesthesia may be a better choice for elective caesarean section. Compared with epidural anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia, it has a higher quality of postoperative comfort and intraoperative anaesthesia.

Non-pharmacological treatments for shivering post neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Shivering occurs more frequently for women having caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia compared to other patient groups and causes an increase in pain and interrupts bonding with her newborn. AIM: This study aimed to report the evidence on non-pharmacological methods to treat shivering, defined as uncontrollable shaking, because of being cold, frightened, or excited, post neuraxial anaesthesia; the use of local anaesthesia inserted around the nerves of the central nervous system such as spinal anaesthesia and epidural in women having a caesarean section. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using six electronic health databases that were searched with no restrictions placed on language, date, or study type. FINDINGS: Of the 1399 studies identified, following screenings only one study was deemed suitable for inclusion. The study, a randomised controlled trial, compared forced air warming blankets (intervention) with the usual care of warmed cotton blankets (control) and its impact on maternal and newborn outcomes. The only statistically significant difference found was the perceived thermal comfort of the mother. DISCUSSION: Non-pharmacological treatments for shivering are underrepresented in the literature; only one study identified where the impact of active warming was compared to warmed cotton blankets (usual care) for the measures of: oral temperature; degree of shivering; and thermal comfort pain scores. There was a decline in temperature in both groups at odds with some women reporting feeling too warm such that they asked for the active warmer to be turned down. CONCLUSION: Social engagement strategies are interventions that send a signal of safety to the nervous system leading to a sense of calm and wellbeing and have biological plausibility and warrant evaluation. Recommendations for further research: design a robust study to test the effectiveness of social engagement strategies on shivering for women having caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia.

Failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: prevention, identification and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is an increasing awareness of the significance of intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery. Failure of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery can occur preoperatively or intraoperatively. Testing of the neuraxial block can identify preoperative failure. Recognition of the risk of high neuraxial block in repeat spinal in case of preoperative failure is important. RECENT FINDING: Knowledge of risk factors for block failure facilitates prevention by selecting the most appropriate neuraxial procedure, adequate intrathecal doses and choice of technique. Intraoperative pain is not uncommon, and neither obstetricians nor anesthesiologists can adequately identify intraoperative pain. Early intraoperative pain should be treated differently from pain towards the end of surgery. SUMMARY: Block testing is crucial to identify preoperative failure of spinal anesthesia. Repeat neuraxial is possible but care must be taken with dosing. In this situation, switching to a combined spinal epidural or an epidural technique can be useful. Intraoperative pain must be acknowledged and adequately treated, including offering general anesthesia. Preoperative informed consent should include block failure and its management.

Evaluation of basal rate infusion in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for post-cesarean section pain management: A randomized pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Administering opioids via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia is a prevalent approach for managing postoperative pain. Nevertheless, due to concerns about opioid-related side effects and the potential for opioid tolerance, there is a growing emphasis on adopting opioid-sparing techniques for postoperative pain management. We aimed to investigate the effect of adding a basal rate infusion in fentanyl-based IVA following a cesarean section (CS). METHOD: Forty-eight patients, who received pain management through IVA after CS, were assigned randomly into 3 groups based on the background rate setting: Group 0 (0 mcg/hour, n = 16), Group 1 (15 mcg/hour, n = 16), and Group 2 (30 mcg/hour, n = 16). We assessed the impact of the basal infusion rate on opioid consumption and the visual analog scale (VAS) scores during the first 48 hours post-CS and also investigated opioid-induced side effects and the requirement for rescue analgesics in the ward during the first 48 hours after CS. RESULTS: In the initial 24 hours following CS, fentanyl consumption significantly increased in Group 2 compared with Group 0 and Group 1 (P = .037). At 24 hours, VAS scores both at rest and during movement, tended to decrease, as the basal rate increased; however, no significant differences were observed between the groups (P = .218 and 0.827, respectively). Between the first 24- and 48-hours post-CS, fentanyl consumption showed a marked increase in both Group 1 and Group 2 compared to Group 0 (P < .001). At 48 hours, the VAS scores at rest displayed a trend toward reduction; however, no significant differences between groups were evident (P = .165). Although the incidence of opioid-induced complications was noted, no statistically significant differences were recorded between groups during the initial 24 hours and subsequent 24 to 48 hours period (P = .556 and P = .345, respectively). CONCLUSION: The inclusion of a basal fentanyl infusion in the IVA protocol did not provide any advantages over an IVA devoid of a basal rate infusion in managing acute pain following CS.

Obstetric blood transfusion in placenta previa patients with prenatal anemia: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate use of obstetric blood transfusion is crucial for patients with placenta previa and prenatal anemia. This retrospective study aims to explore the correlation between prenatal anemia and blood transfusion-related parameters in this population. METHODS: We retrieved the medical records of consecutive participants who were diagnosed with placenta previa and underwent cesarean section in our hospital. We compared the baseline demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with and without anemia. The correlation between prenatal anemia and obstetric blood transfusion-related parameters was evaluated using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 749 patients were enrolled, with a mean prenatal hemoglobin level of 10.87 ± 1.37 g/dL. Among them, 54.87% (391/749) were diagnosed with anemia. The rate of obstetric blood transfusion was significantly higher in the anemia group (79.54%) compared to the normal group (44.41%). The median allogeneic red blood cell transfusion volume in the anemia group was 4.00 U (IQR 2.00-6.00), while in the normal group, it was 0.00 U (IQR 0.00-4.00). The prenatal hemoglobin levels had a non-linear relationship with intraoperative allogeneic blood transfusion rate, massive blood transfusion rate, red blood cell transfusion units, and fresh plasma transfusion volume in patients with placenta previa, with a threshold of 12 g/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that prenatal anemia is associated with a higher rate of blood transfusion-related parameters in women with placenta previa when the hemoglobin level is < 12 g/dL. These results highlight the importance of promoting prenatal care in placenta previa patients with a high requirement for blood transfusion.

Perinatal outcome of emergency cesarean section under neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia: a seven-year retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: An emergency cesarean section (CS), which is extremely life-threatening to the mother or fetus, seems to be performed within an adequate time horizon to avoid negative fetal-maternal denouement. An effective and vigilant technique for anesthesia remains vital for emergency cesarean delivery. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the impact of various anesthesia tactics on maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study of parturient patients who were selected for emergency CS with the assistance of general or neuraxial anesthesia between January 2015 and July 2021 at our institution. The 5-min Apgar score was documented as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes, including the 1 min Apgar score, decision-to-delivery interval (DDI), onset of anesthesia to incision interval (OAII), decision to incision interval (DII), duration of operation, length of hospitalization, height and weight of the newborn, use of vasopressors, blood loss, neonatal resuscitation rate, admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), duration of NICU and complications, were also measured. RESULTS: Of the 539 patients included in the analysis, 337 CSs were performed under general anesthesia (GA), 137 under epidural anesthesia (EA) and 65 under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). The Apgar scores at 1 min and 5 min in newborns receiving GA were lower than those receiving intraspinal anesthesia, and no difference was found between those receiving EA and those receiving CSEA. The DDI of parturients under GA, EA, and CSE were 7[6,7], 6[6,7], and 14[11.5,20.5], respectively. The DDI and DII of GA and EA were shorter than those of CSE, and the DDI and DII were similar between GA and EA. Compared to that in the GA group, the OAII in the intraspinal anesthesia group was significantly greater. GA administration correlated with more frequent resuscitative interventions, increased admission rates to NICU, and a greater incidence of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). Nevertheless, the duration of NICU stay and the incidence rates of neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and pneumonia did not significantly differ based on the type of anesthesia performed. CONCLUSION: Compared with general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia may not be associated with a negative impact on neonatal or maternal outcomes and could be utilized as an alternative to general anesthesia in our selected patient population following emergency cesarean section; In addition, a comparably short DDI was achieved for emergency cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia when compared to general anesthesia in our study. However, the possibility that selection bias related to the retrospective study design may have influenced the results cannot be excluded.

Efficacy of quadratus lumborum block in the treatment of acute and chronic pain after cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: This analysis aimed to explore the analgesic effects of quadratus lumborum block on acute and chronic postoperative pain among patients undergoing cesarean section. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP databases for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that focused on the use of quadratus lumborum block in cesarean section procedures were searched from the inception of the databases until December 2022. Studies were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and were then conducted for quality assessment and data extraction. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software. Two researchers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias for the included studies. In case of any disagreements, it was resolved by consultation with a third party opinion. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies involving 1976 patients were finally included, with an overall acceptable study quality level. Compared to the control group, the administration of Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) resulted in significant reduction in the postoperative 24-hour visual analog scale (VAS) score (WMD = -0.69, 95% CI: -1.03 ~ -0.35, P < .001) and the consumption of opioid analgesics within 24 hours after surgery (WMD = -2.04, 95% CI: -2.15 ~ -1.92, P = .002). The incidence of chronic pain 3 months QLB (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.09 ~ 1.88, P = .253) and 6 months (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.33 ~ 2.07, P = .686) after surgery were observed to increase as compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of QLB for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section, particularly in the relief of acute postoperative pain, had been proven to significantly decrease the VAS score and morphine consumption within the first 24 hours after surgery. However, further studies are needed to determine its impact on managing chronic postoperative pain.

Complications after opportunistic salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation at cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative and postoperative complications in patients who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) (removal of the fallopian tubes for ovarian cancer risk reduction during another surgery) at the time of cesarean section (C-section) with those in patients who underwent tubal ligation. DESIGN: A population-based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: British Columbia, Canada. PATIENT(S): A total of 18,184 patients were included in this study, of whom 8,440 and 9,744 underwent OS and tubal ligation, respectively. INTERVENTION(S): Patients who underwent OS during a C-section were compared with those who underwent tubal ligation during a C-section. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We examined the perioperative outcomes, including operating room time, length of hospital stay, surgical complications such as infections, anemia, incision complications, injury to a pelvic organ, or operating room return; postoperative complications, including physician visits for a postoperative infection or visits that resulted in ultrasound or laboratory examinations and hospital readmissions in the 6 weeks after discharge; and likelihood to fill a prescription for antibiotics or analgesics. RESULT(S): The OS group had decreased odds of perioperative complications compared with the tubal ligation group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.99). Patients who underwent OS did not have increased risks of physician visits for surgical complications, such as infection, or hospital readmissions in the 6 weeks after hospital discharge. In addition, these patients had 18% and 23% increased odds of filling prescriptions for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.28) and opioids (aOR, 1.23%; 95% CI, 1.12-1.35), respectively. CONCLUSION(S): In this population-based, real-world study of OS at C-section, we report decreased perioperative complications and no difference in postoperative complications between patients who underwent OS and those who underwent tubal ligation. Patients who underwent OS had an increased likelihood of filling a prescription for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the 6 weeks after hospital discharge. This result should be interpreted with caution because we did not have data on over-the-counter medication use and, thus, not all prescription analgesics were captured in our data. Our data suggest that OS after C-section is a safe way to provide effective contraception and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

A novel extraperitoneal cesarean section of supravesical approach: Operative techniques.

AIM: We have established a novel extraperitoneal cesarean section technique by supravesical approach. An advantage of this technique over the conventional paravesical approach is that the lower uterine segment is broadly exposed and that all operative procedures can be performed under direct vision. We present the details of this novel technique. METHODS: The bladder and the peritoneum are exposed by removing the transversalis and extraperitoneal fasciae. Subsequently, a triangular area between the median umbilical ligament, the peritoneum, and the bladder is exposed. The median umbilical ligament is dissected at this site. Bladder dissection from the peritoneum is also initiated from this area and proceeds toward the lower uterine segment. RESULTS: Operative times for pelvic fascia dissection and bladder removal from the peritoneal surface are currently around 15-25 min. During the process of development of this technique, there have been no bladder injuries in 501 patients that caused urine leakage. DISCUSSION: The supravesical approach has been considered difficult due to the strong adhesion between the perivesical fascia and the peritoneum at the bladder fundus. In this paper, we show how to safely remove the bladder fundus from the peritoneum. The bladder can then be easily lowered down toward the lower uterine segment. Although this technique allows the lower uterine segment to be broadly exposed and all operative procedures can be performed under direct vision, a disadvantage is the comparatively long time currently required to perform it. CONCLUSIONS: This technique could be a valuable option for extraperitoneal cesarean section, but disadvantages must also be considered.

Placenta accreta spectrum care infrastructure: an evidence-based review of needed resources supporting placenta accreta spectrum care.

The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum, the deeply adherent placenta with associated increased risk of maternal morbidity and mortality, has seen a significant rise in recent years. Therefore, there has been a rise in clinical and research focus on this complex diagnosis. There is international consensus that a multidisciplinary coordinated approach optimizes outcomes. The composition of the team will vary from center to center; however, central themes of complex surgical experts, specialists in prenatal diagnosis, critical care specialists, neonatology specialists, obstetrics anesthesiology specialists, blood bank specialists, and dedicated mental health experts are universal throughout. Regionalization of care is a growing trend for complex medical needs, but the location of care alone is just a starting point. The goal of this article is to provide an evidence-based framework for the crucial infrastructure needed to address the unique antepartum, delivery, and postpartum needs of the patient with placenta accreta spectrum. Rather than a clinical checklist, we describe the personnel, clinical unit characteristics, and breadth of contributing clinical roles that make up a team. Screening protocols, diagnostic imaging, surgical and potential need for critical care, and trauma-informed interaction are the basis for comprehensive care. The vision from the author group is that this publication provides a semblance of infrastructure standardization as a means to ensure proper preparation and readiness.